Attention: Here be dragons
This is the latest
(unstable) version of this documentation, which may document features
not available in or compatible with released stable versions of Godot.
Checking the stable version of the documentation...
Godot 介面
我們常常會需要為了一些功能而讓腳本仰賴其他物件。這個過程可以分為兩個部分:
取得可能有該功能的物件之參照。
從該物件存取資料或邏輯。
本篇教學接下來的部分將介紹各種達成此目的的方法。
取得物件參照
對於所有 Object,最基本的參照方式是從已取得的實體物件取得現有物件的參照。
var obj = node.object # Property access.
var obj = node.get_object() # Method access.
GodotObject obj = node.Object; // Property access.
GodotObject obj = node.GetObject(); // Method access.
同樣的原則也適用於 RefCounted 物件。雖然多數人會這樣存取 Node 和 Resource,但也有其他方式。
除了存取屬性或方法,也可以通過 load 存取來取得 Resource。
# If you need an "export const var" (which doesn't exist), use a conditional
# setter for a tool script that checks if it's executing in the editor.
# The `@tool` annotation must be placed at the top of the script.
@tool
# Load resource during scene load.
var preres = preload(path)
# Load resource when program reaches statement.
var res = load(path)
# Note that users load scenes and scripts, by convention, with PascalCase
# names (like typenames), often into constants.
const MyScene = preload("my_scene.tscn") # Static load
const MyScript = preload("my_script.gd")
# This type's value varies, i.e. it is a variable, so it uses snake_case.
@export var script_type: Script
# Must configure from the editor, defaults to null.
@export var const_script: Script:
set(value):
if Engine.is_editor_hint():
const_script = value
# Warn users if the value hasn't been set.
func _get_configuration_warnings():
if not const_script:
return ["Must initialize property 'const_script'."]
return []
// Tool script added for the sake of the "const [Export]" example.
[Tool]
public MyType
{
// Property initializations load during Script instancing, i.e. .new().
// No "preload" loads during scene load exists in C#.
// Initialize with a value. Editable at runtime.
public Script MyScript = GD.Load<Script>("res://Path/To/MyScript.cs");
// Initialize with same value. Value cannot be changed.
public readonly Script MyConstScript = GD.Load<Script>("res://Path/To/MyScript.cs");
// Like 'readonly' due to inaccessible setter.
// But, value can be set during constructor, i.e. MyType().
public Script MyNoSetScript { get; } = GD.Load<Script>("res://Path/To/MyScript.cs");
// If need a "const [Export]" (which doesn't exist), use a
// conditional setter for a tool script that checks if it's executing
// in the editor.
private PackedScene _enemyScn;
[Export]
public PackedScene EnemyScn
{
get { return _enemyScn; }
set
{
if (Engine.IsEditorHint())
{
_enemyScn = value;
}
}
};
// Warn users if the value hasn't been set.
public string[] _GetConfigurationWarnings()
{
if (EnemyScn == null)
{
return ["Must initialize property 'EnemyScn'."];
}
return [];
}
}
請注意下列事項:
在一種語言當中,有許多載入這種 Resource 的方法。
在設計物件如何存取資料時,請不要忘記,我們也可用參照來傳遞資源。
請記得,載入資源會載入由引擎快取的資源實體。若要取得新物件,則必須要 複製 現有參照,或用
new()來重新實體化資源。
Node 也有另一個替代的存取點:SceneTree 場景樹。
extends Node
# Slow.
func dynamic_lookup_with_dynamic_nodepath():
print(get_node("Child"))
# Faster. GDScript only.
func dynamic_lookup_with_cached_nodepath():
print($Child)
# Fastest. Doesn't break if node moves later.
# Note that `@onready` annotation is GDScript-only.
# Other languages must do...
# var child
# func _ready():
# child = get_node("Child")
@onready var child = $Child
func lookup_and_cache_for_future_access():
print(child)
# Fastest. Doesn't break if node is moved in the Scene tree dock.
# Node must be selected in the inspector as it's an exported property.
@export var child: Node
func lookup_and_cache_for_future_access():
print(child)
# Delegate reference assignment to an external source.
# Con: need to perform a validation check.
# Pro: node makes no requirements of its external structure.
# 'prop' can come from anywhere.
var prop
func call_me_after_prop_is_initialized_by_parent():
# Validate prop in one of three ways.
# Fail with no notification.
if not prop:
return
# Fail with an error message.
if not prop:
printerr("'prop' wasn't initialized")
return
# Fail and terminate.
# NOTE: Scripts run from a release export template don't run `assert`s.
assert(prop, "'prop' wasn't initialized")
# Use an autoload.
# Dangerous for typical nodes, but useful for true singleton nodes
# that manage their own data and don't interfere with other objects.
func reference_a_global_autoloaded_variable():
print(globals)
print(globals.prop)
print(globals.my_getter())
using Godot;
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
public class MyNode : Node
{
// Slow
public void DynamicLookupWithDynamicNodePath()
{
GD.Print(GetNode("Child"));
}
// Fastest. Lookup node and cache for future access.
// Doesn't break if node moves later.
private Node _child;
public void _Ready()
{
_child = GetNode("Child");
}
public void LookupAndCacheForFutureAccess()
{
GD.Print(_child);
}
// Delegate reference assignment to an external source.
// Con: need to perform a validation check.
// Pro: node makes no requirements of its external structure.
// 'prop' can come from anywhere.
public object Prop { get; set; }
public void CallMeAfterPropIsInitializedByParent()
{
// Validate prop in one of three ways.
// Fail with no notification.
if (prop == null)
{
return;
}
// Fail with an error message.
if (prop == null)
{
GD.PrintErr("'Prop' wasn't initialized");
return;
}
// Fail with an exception.
if (prop == null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("'Prop' wasn't initialized.");
}
// Fail and terminate.
// Note: Scripts run from a release export template don't run `Debug.Assert`s.
Debug.Assert(Prop, "'Prop' wasn't initialized");
}
// Use an autoload.
// Dangerous for typical nodes, but useful for true singleton nodes
// that manage their own data and don't interfere with other objects.
public void ReferenceAGlobalAutoloadedVariable()
{
MyNode globals = GetNode<MyNode>("/root/Globals");
GD.Print(globals);
GD.Print(globals.Prop);
GD.Print(globals.MyGetter());
}
};
從物件中存取資料或邏輯
Godot 的腳本 API 是鴨子型別的。這代表,當腳本執行某樣操作時,Godot 不會用 型別 來驗證該物件是否支援該操作,而是檢查該物件是否有 實作 個別方法。
舉例來說, CanvasItem 類別有一個 visible 屬性。所有暴露在腳本 API 中的屬性,事實上都是繫結在名稱上的 Setter 與 Getter 配對。當我們嘗試存取 CanvasItem.visible 時,Godot 會照順序進行下列檢查:
若物件有附加腳本,則會嘗試在腳本中設定屬性。這樣就能讓腳本覆寫該屬性的 Setter 方法,讓腳本有覆寫基礎物件中定義的屬性的機會。
若腳本沒有該屬性,則會在 ClassDB 中通過 HashMap 查詢來找到 CanvasItem 類別與其繼承的所有型別中的「visible」屬性。若有找到,則會繫結 Setter 與 Getter。更多有關 HashMaps 的資訊,請參考 資料偏好 文件。
若找不到,則會明確地檢查使用者要存取的是不是「script」或「meta」屬性。
若不是的話,則會檢查 CanvasItem 與其繼承的型別中是否有實作
_set與_get(依據存取型別的不同)。這兩個方法可以執行一組邏輯,讓該物件看起來有這個屬性。同樣地,有_get_property_list方法也是這樣。請注意,即使對於不合法的符號名稱也會發生這種情況,例如以數位開頭或包含斜杠(/)的名稱。
最後,這個鴨子型別系統可以在腳本、物件類別或任何物件繼承的類別中找到屬性,但只適用於繼承了 Object 的物件中。
Godot 提供了各種能在執行階段執行這些檢查的方法:
鴨子型別屬性存取。這種方法會進行屬性檢查 (如上所示)。若物件不支援該操作,則會終止執行。
# All Objects have duck-typed get, set, and call wrapper methods. get_parent().set("visible", false) # Using a symbol accessor, rather than a string in the method call, # will implicitly call the `set` method which, in turn, calls the # setter method bound to the property through the property lookup # sequence. get_parent().visible = false # Note that if one defines a _set and _get that describe a property's # existence, but the property isn't recognized in any _get_property_list # method, then the set() and get() methods will work, but the symbol # access will claim it can't find the property.
// All Objects have duck-typed Get, Set, and Call wrapper methods. GetParent().Set("visible", false); // C# is a static language, so it has no dynamic symbol access, e.g. // `GetParent().Visible = false` won't work.
方法檢查。在 CanvasItem.visible 的情況下,我們可以像其他方法一樣存取
set_visible與is_visible方法。var child = get_child(0) # Dynamic lookup. child.call("set_visible", false) # Symbol-based dynamic lookup. # GDScript aliases this into a 'call' method behind the scenes. child.set_visible(false) # Dynamic lookup, checks for method existence first. if child.has_method("set_visible"): child.set_visible(false) # Cast check, followed by dynamic lookup. # Useful when you make multiple "safe" calls knowing that the class # implements them all. No need for repeated checks. # Tricky if one executes a cast check for a user-defined type as it # forces more dependencies. if child is CanvasItem: child.set_visible(false) child.show_on_top = true # If one does not wish to fail these checks without notifying users, # one can use an assert instead. These will trigger runtime errors # immediately if not true. assert(child.has_method("set_visible")) assert(child.is_in_group("offer")) assert(child is CanvasItem) # Can also use object labels to imply an interface, i.e. assume it # implements certain methods. # There are two types, both of which only exist for Nodes: Names and # Groups. # Assuming... # A "Quest" object exists and 1) that it can "complete" or "fail" and # that it will have text available before and after each state... # 1. Use a name. var quest = $Quest print(quest.text) quest.complete() # or quest.fail() print(quest.text) # implied new text content # 2. Use a group. for a_child in get_children(): if a_child.is_in_group("quest"): print(quest.text) quest.complete() # or quest.fail() print(quest.text) # implied new text content # Note that these interfaces are project-specific conventions the team # defines (which means documentation! But maybe worth it?). # Any script that conforms to the documented "interface" of the name or # group can fill in for it.
Node child = GetChild(0); // Dynamic lookup. child.Call("SetVisible", false); // Dynamic lookup, checks for method existence first. if (child.HasMethod("SetVisible")) { child.Call("SetVisible", false); } // Use a group as if it were an "interface", i.e. assume it implements // certain methods. // Requires good documentation for the project to keep it reliable // (unless you make editor tools to enforce it at editor time). // Note, this is generally not as good as using an actual interface in // C#, but you can't set C# interfaces from the editor since they are // language-level features. if (child.IsInGroup("Offer")) { child.Call("Accept"); child.Call("Reject"); } // Cast check, followed by static lookup. CanvasItem ci = GetParent() as CanvasItem; if (ci != null) { ci.SetVisible(false); // useful when you need to make multiple safe calls to the class ci.ShowOnTop = true; } // If one does not wish to fail these checks without notifying users, // one can use an assert instead. These will trigger runtime errors // immediately if not true. Debug.Assert(child.HasMethod("set_visible")); Debug.Assert(child.IsInGroup("offer")); Debug.Assert(CanvasItem.InstanceHas(child)); // Can also use object labels to imply an interface, i.e. assume it // implements certain methods. // There are two types, both of which only exist for Nodes: Names and // Groups. // Assuming... // A "Quest" object exists and 1) that it can "Complete" or "Fail" and // that it will have Text available before and after each state... // 1. Use a name. Node quest = GetNode("Quest"); GD.Print(quest.Get("Text")); quest.Call("Complete"); // or "Fail". GD.Print(quest.Get("Text")); // Implied new text content. // 2. Use a group. foreach (Node AChild in GetChildren()) { if (AChild.IsInGroup("quest")) { GD.Print(quest.Get("Text")); quest.Call("Complete"); // or "Fail". GD.Print(quest.Get("Text")); // Implied new text content. } } // Note that these interfaces are project-specific conventions the team // defines (which means documentation! But maybe worth it?). // Any script that conforms to the documented "interface" of the // name or group can fill in for it. Also note that in C#, these methods // will be slower than static accesses with traditional interfaces.
將存取委託給 Callable 處理。這在需要最大程度去除相依時很有用,這時必須由外部脈絡來設定方法。
# child.gd
extends Node
var fn = null
func my_method():
if fn:
fn.call()
# parent.gd
extends Node
@onready var child = $Child
func _ready():
child.fn = print_me
child.my_method()
func print_me():
print(name)
// Child.cs
using Godot;
public partial class Child : Node
{
public Callable? Callable { get; set; }
public void MyMethod()
{
Callable?.Call();
}
}
// Parent.cs
using Godot;
public partial class Parent : Node
{
private Child _child;
public void _Ready()
{
_child = GetNode<Child>("Child");
_child.Callable = Callable.From(PrintMe);
_child.MyMethod();
}
public void PrintMe()
{
GD.Print(Name);
}
}
多虧這些策略,Godot 才有靈活的設計。有了這些策略,使用者便有了豐富的工具來滿足特殊需求。